Jump To Navigation
3 Board Certified Criminal Defense Lawyers | Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal SpecializationExperience That Counts, Results That Matter.

FindLaw News

News

Crime

[02/08] Actor Gary Coleman pleads guilty in Utah court
[02/08] Rutgers sorority women plead not guilty to hazing
[02/08] Barzee pleads guilty to charge in Smart case

More...

Top Headlines

[02/08] Reports: Toyota plans to recall 300,000 Priuses
[02/08] Michael Jackson doctor charged in singer's death
[02/08] Ex-Intel executive pleads guilty in NYC to fraud

More...

White Collar Crime

[02/08] Minn. exec to be sentenced March 10 in Ponzi fraud
[02/08] Michael Jackson doctor charged in singer's death
[02/05] Feds: Former body armor CEO spent $350K on pens

More...

Case Summaries

Criminal Law & Procedure

[02/08] US v. Schneider
In a prosecution for impermissibly dispensing controlled drugs, an order excluding evidence of all but one of the eighteen deaths charged in one count of the indictment and the court's placement of a ten-day limitation on the government's time to present its case is vacated where the district court's ruling effectively dismissed separately charged conduct brought by the government against defendants, and thus impermissibly intruded upon the authority of the executive branch to design a criminal prosecution in the way it deemed most prudent.

[01/14] State of Florida v. Nelson
In a conviction of a juvenile defendant for burglary and related crime, the decision of the Fourth District is quashed and remanded as, when the State is entitled to the recapture period, a continuance that is chargeable to the defense and made after the expiration of the speedy trial period but before a defendant files a notice expiration waives a defendant's speedy trial rights under the default period of the rule.

[01/14] Johnson v. State of Florida
Defendant's request for postconviction relief is granted and the death sentences vacated and remanded where the newly disclosed evidence shows the following: 1) after defendant was arrested and counsel was appointed, the State intentionally created a situation likely to induce defendant to make incriminating statements to a jailhouse informant in violation of defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel; 2) although the prosecutor at defendant's first trial knew that his statements were impermissibly elicited and that his testimony was inadmissible, the prosecutor knowingly used false testimony and misleading argument to convince the court to admit the testimony; and 3) because defendant's testimony was admitted and later used by a different prosecutor at defendant's 1988 trial, and because the State has failed to show that this error did not contribute to the jury's advisory sentences of death, the death sentences are vacated and remanded under Giglio v. US.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.